After viewing Akiva Goldsman’s Winter’s Tale earlier this year, I did not think I would ever encounter an equally confusing film, but newly released war film Fury comes very close.
Review by Cherie Wheeler
It’s 1945, and although World War II is coming to an end, the American troops remain in German territory, and the fighting wages on. Written and directed by action filmmaker David Ayer, Fury follows Don “Wardaddy” Collier (Brad Pitt) who commands a tight knit team that operate a tank after which the film is named. Following the death of one of their comrades, the freshly recruited Norman Ellison (Logan Lerman) is ordered to join the crew, but he is not exactly welcomed with open arms. Norman struggles to cope with the horrors of war, and this coupled with his aversion to violence causes his popularity among the other men to suffer even further. After a devastating loss on the battlefield that leaves Fury as the last US tank standing, Collier convinces his men to join him on a suicide mission in which they are outnumbered by Germans, 60 to 1. Shia LaBeouf, Michael Peña and Jon Bernthal also star.
Like a lot of viewers, I have certainly seen my fair share of war movies. From the earlier films (Bridge On The River Kwai ), to those released this year (Lone Survivor), to those covering the Vietnam War (Full Metal Jacket), to films about the more recent wars throughout the Middle East and Afghanistan (Black Hawk Down), from American TV shows (Band of Brothers), to Australian feature films (Beneath Hill 60); my point is that I have a lot of previous viewing experience with which to compare this latest film, and I can honestly say that Fury might just be the worst war film ever made.
The root of the problem lies with David Ayer’s utterly baffling screenplay. For the majority of the film I was sitting there wondering; why is this even happening right now? There is no plot structure or storyline; events simply unfold without any meaning or purpose. I struggled to explain the narrative in my plot synopsis above, and the suicide mission I refer to (which is marketed as the key plot point in the film) actually only takes place in the last 30 minutes.
Each of the five main characters that comprise the tank team are highly underdeveloped, and riddled with inconsistencies. For example; Jon Bernthal’s character does not seem to know whether he respects his commander, loathes him, or loves him to the extent that he would die for him, and he tends to flit between each of these states without any justification. Collier is equally erratic, which becomes most apparent when he starts screaming, “I’m going to hold this crossroad,” and insists on taking on this completely pointless endeavour that will have no impact on the war whatsoever. At first his men object to his insanity, but naturally, out of loyalty to him, they eventually decide to help him in this ridiculous mission.
Perhaps Ayer was simply trying to demonstrate the absurdity of war, and the madness that overcomes men as a result of being subjected to this, which may explain the irrational actions of each of the characters, but this is not just cause for the many bizarre events that comprise the overall narrative. A near half hour scene in the home of two German women is a prime example. This scene, much like the film as a whole, has so much potential, but in the end it comes across as a hot mess. Far too many ideas and subplots were packed into this scene, consequently none of them were able to be fully explored, and all of them were executed poorly.
I have a lot respect and admiration for Brad Pitt and his acting abilities, but honestly, what the hell was he thinking when he agreed to take on this project? He is satisfactory in the lead role; whilst he does not excel, at least he isn’t dreadful, unlike some of his co-stars.
For almost 80 per cent of the movie Shia LaBeouf looks like he is about to burst into tears, as if he has been sniffing onions in between takes. The southern accent he puts on is so thick that most of the time you will have no idea what he is saying. All of the cast members throw an excessive amount of emotion around the screen that comes across as both contrived and at times unnecessary. Logan Lerman is the only saving grace in the film. Young Australian actor Xavier Samuel has a brief appearance early on, and at first I was a little disappointed that he did not snag Lerman’s role, but afterwards I realised that this was a blessing. A lead role in this film may have ruined Samuel’s career, which is still in its infancy.
I must give credit where credit is due, however, and the sound design throughout Fury is quite good, although not as good as that in Lone Survivor. There are some interesting shots here and there, such as a pull focus from a close up of the boots of a dead man hanging in the streets, to a wide shot of the American tanks slowly rolling down the main road. The opening scene of a German soldier on horseback is also shot beautifully, and during this scene there is an instance of violence that is very confronting, which led me to believe that the rest of the film would follow in this style, but sadly it was all downhill from there.
The only reason I did not walk out of the cinema when watching this film is because of my need to write this review, consequently I am giving Fury 1.5 stars.